Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10329 14
Original file (NR10329 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
RRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

rey COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100!
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

Board for Correction oO

From: Chairman,
secretary of the Navy

 

TS }
Sub] :
Ret (a) 10 T.S Gs, 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 atd 31 Jul 14 w/attachments
(2) PERS-32 memo dta 26 Jan 15 w/attachments
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Sub ject,
nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
] ble navel record be

fF act

ting, in efrec

   

 

pecans
correct

evidence ~enord.

 

consisted | t

policies.
record pertaining

ice, finds as follows:

3 The Board, havi

as

to Petitioner's all

ed all the Tracts of
e

egations of

Petitioner exhausted all

s Board,
d regulations

Before applying to ehh
der existing law an

remedies available un
f the Nevy-

a.
administrative
within the Department ©

Personnel Command (NPC) office

of Petitioner's case has

warrants favorable
ted report be

(2), the Navy
subject matter
e request has merit and
ded that the contes
that Petitioner submit an

b, In enclosure

with cognizance over the

mmented to the effect th
That office recommen
removal,

jee)

action.
removed, and upon its
- administrative change letter to change the start date of the
following evaluation, for 1 March to 15 June 2014, from 1 March 2014
following evelogi3, ro maintain continuity (Petitioner! s sore a°8°

includes an evaluation for 3 September to 24 November SOLS: i

CONCLUSION :

— x news ana

eens Aas ot 1 La

Upon review and consideration ef all the evidence Of =Stee™:
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence

of an error warranting the following corrective. action:

RECOMMENDATION :

1 record be corrected by removing the
sted performance evaluation report and

aor That Petitioner's nava

following “special” enli
related material:

Period of Report
From TO

 

03 Sep 13 28 Feb 14

b. That NO memorandum be filed in place of the report to be
y means of an

a
as continuity can be maintained b

removed,
administrative change letter modifying the report for 1 March to 15
‘ . «a . =
June 2014 to begin on 25 November 2015, rather than i Merch 2014.
Cc Thet appropriacs novrections be mage to she magnetic raps
or migtol2-1 meinteineé by NPC
c That any maLeriai oz enteries -noonsistent wilh oF elating
§ 2 ation be corrected, ~emovea OF completely
'

s record and that no such entries

oO
material be added to the record in the future.

4, Pursuant to section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,

Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at ‘the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder
ity set out in Section 6 (e)
Correction of Naval Records
6(e)) and having assured

e delegation of author

OF the revised Procedures of the Board for

(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy. MIT) y
Lil Mort

ROBERT J. oO’ NETLL
Executive Director

S Pursuant to th

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4541 14

    Original file (NR4541 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s Date of Rank be corrected to show a date of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013, now of record. The Board, consisting of Mr. vogt, Mr. Ruskin and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2686 14

    Original file (NR2686 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hedrick, Marquez and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (4), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, has commented to the effect that both contested fitness reports should be removed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08436-01

    Original file (08436-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Without action by this Board, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) removed the fitness report, but their action was not effected until after Petitioner ’s FY 02 failure. CONCLUSION: all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting removal of Upon review and consideration of contents of enclosure Petitioner’s failure of selection by the FY 02 Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board. As he did not request removal of his FY...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7175 13

    Original file (NR7175 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 14 October 2011, she appeared before her CO at “Captain's Counseling.” The GCMA (letter dated 23 April 2012) found that Petitioner failed to report her shipmate’s incident, and that she exhibited a “complete lack of decorum and military bearing while being counseled by [her co] .” g. Petitioner contends that the evaluation at issue, the removal of her frocking authorization and the withdrawal of her recommendation for advancement were unjust and unwarranted, as she did notify SHCM W--- of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00757-09

    Original file (00757-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd Docket No, 00757-10° 28 January 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: | Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD: Ref: - (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6490 14

    Original file (NR6490 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the- applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's Date of Rank to CWO3 be corrected to show a date of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013, now of record. © 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Fxnicios, Ms. McCain and Ms. Aldrich reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined ‘that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2968 14

    Original file (NR2968 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was offered continuation to a date that allows him the opportunity to gain eligibility for Reserve retired pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3893 14

    Original file (NR3893 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to 5 advanced to B-5/MM2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement | evele. Navy Personnel Command is directed to issue Petitioner a DD Form 215 to correct his effective date of rank and pay. 7, Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8080 14

    Original file (NR8080 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...